Does LizziAI practice law, replace our attorneys, or provide legal advice?

No. LizziAI does not practice law, does not provide legal advice, does not sign filings, and does not replace any attorney at your firm. LizziAI drafts operational content only, and every attorney-facing output is drafted for review by a licensed attorney before it leaves the firm.

The scope of what LizziAI does is deliberately narrow: it drafts client intake responses, scheduling coordination messages, non-substantive status updates ("we received your document, an attorney will review"), matter-opening administrative correspondence, engagement letter routing, marketing content, and internal team coordination. It does not draft substantive legal analysis, briefs, motions, memoranda of law, contracts, or anything that constitutes the practice of law.

The UPL boundary is codified in the drafting logic. When a client asks LizziAI a legal question in an operational thread, LizziAI redirects the conversation with a message like "I want to make sure an attorney addresses this directly, I am forwarding your question to your matter team," and routes the thread to the responsible attorney. LizziAI does not attempt to answer. This is the same discipline a well-trained legal assistant applies today, codified so it happens consistently regardless of message volume.

Every LizziAI draft is reviewed and approved by a human at the firm before sending. The attorney or paralegal sees the draft, edits or rewrites as needed, and clicks send. Nothing goes to a client without an eyes-on approval. The value is drafting speed, not drafting autonomy.

For substantive legal drafting (briefs, contracts, memoranda), your existing tools stay in place: your document management system, your document assembly platform, and your legal research tools all continue to do what they do. See LizziAI capabilities for the operational drafting scope and the UPL redirect logic.